Period
pieces often serve as Oscar bait. Having a quick scan over the best
Oscar winners since the beginning of the eighties, it seems most have
some kind of historical setting. From Gladiator to Titanic from
Forest Gump to Lord of the Ringsi
the academy seem to like being taken into the past and meeting
characters with period hair and clothing. American Hustle provides
lots of period clothing and hair and is very aware of it's
historical setting and my guess is the Oscar Academy will be
impressed. Set in the late 1970s, David O'Russell's American Hustle
is a fictionalisation of the Abscam affair, in which the FBI enlisted
(in the film forced) con artists to entrap, um I mean, ensnare senior
politicians in a bribery sting, using a fake Arab Sheik.
Following
closely on the heels of O'Russell's heavily nominated Silver Linings
Playbook and starring Oscar winners Christian Bale, Jennifer Lawrence
and Robert De Niro and with nominees Bradley Cooper, Jeremy Renner
and Amy Adams, you have to assume that the producers had the Oscars very
much on their mind as they were pulling everything together. So I
guess the question is this - does bringing together all this talent in
one film actually work and does it deserve the accolades it so very desperately wants?
The Good
This film is comparable
to last year's best Oscar Winner Argo, in that it draws from a real
historical event as the basis for a caper movie. I thought the
opening slide stating “Some of this actually happened” was a nice
touch and deflects much of the criticism that can, sometimes
legitimately, be leveled at Argo and the like for the liberties
they take with history. There is something quite delightful about
watching essentially corrupt characters, whether they be con artists
or FBI agents, uncover a different type of corruption at the highest
levels of politics. There was also something appropriate about the
melancholy ending that suggested that despite everyone's efforts,
nothing of consequence had been achieved. In general, O'Russell has
chosen an interesting story, one that allows for an eclectic cast of
characters and in the end it is a character piece.
You'd expect, given the
gilded cast, that the acting wouldn't be half bad and the players are
indeed the strongest and most successful element of American Hustle.
The film is not just about the individual characters but the
relationships between them which drive both the plot and
performances. The central romance, between Bale's Irving Rosenfeld
and Adams' Sydney Prosser, was both endearing and well played. I
enjoyed how quickly I, much like Irving and Sydney, rapidly put aside
my moral questions regarding the extra marital romance and just enjoy
the relationship. Jennifer Lawrence gives a flawless performance as
the emotionally unstable Rosalyn and does far more with the “other
woman” role than a lesser actor could (though I feel the
film-makers tried very hard to make her unattractive and failed).
Another key relationship in the film is between Irving and Jeremy
Renner's Mayor Polito. We see them develop a star crossed platonic
relationship, doomed to disaster due to Irving's forced duplicity.
Renner's performance, perhaps the most understated of all the cast,
was well pitched. Of all the characters, I sympathised with Polito
the most, especially at the moment he sees everything collapsing in
on itself. Also, the bickering, almost fraternal relationship
between FBI agents played by Bradley Cooper and Louis CK was perhaps
where the comedic elements of the film were at their strongest. I
really wanted to hear the end of the ice fishing story.
The Bad
Given the near
universal good performances of almost every actor involved you'd
expect the problems with American Hustle to be few and minor.
Unfortunately, despite the Oscar worthy acting the film suffers from
having too many characters, too many plot lines and just too much to
do in the standard running time of a motion picture. As stated, the
film is, in part, about the relationships between the characters.
You have the extra marital affair between Bale and Adams, the failing
marriage story involving Bale and Lawrence, there is the developing
friendship between Bale and Renner, the boss employee relationship
between Cooper and CK and the largely pointless extra extra marital
affair between Cooper and Adams which is mixed up with the penis
measuring relationship between Bale and Cooper and on the fringes we
have the scorned wife and other woman relationship between Lawrence
and Adams. If I were to draw up some kind of relationship chart it
would be far more complicated that those diagrams used to explain the
plot of inception to stupid peopleii.
There simply isn't enough to be drawn in to and the audience is not given
the time to actually give a crap about any of the relationships. The cast is entirely A-list, so
perhaps this was a problem over screen time negotiations or perhaps it was the
screen writers unwillingness to focus too much on one or two
characters. Whatever the reason, the complex web of interaction
leaves the plot drawn out and unfocused to the point where I left the
cinema not entirely knowing what the point of the film was supposed to be.
There has been a lot of discussion about American Hustle being nominated for "Best Musical or Comedy" as people were unsure that it can be described as a comedy. I think this is a symptom of the film's disjointedness. Is is a comedy, a drama, a caper, a political satire, a period piece, a romantic film, a bromantic film, a film about FBI agents or a film about con artists? In the end American hustle attempts to be all of these and ends up being very little.
Given this lack of focus, American Hustle essentially turns into two hours of Oscar winning and nominated actors acting their asses off. In fact, in the end, I felt like I was being acted at rather than experiencing a story.
There were other minor
issues. The film goes to great lengths to continually remind you
that we are in the late 70s. Other films, like Argo or Wolf of Wall
street, seem to be able to set the period whilst keeping in firmly in
the background. Everything in American Hustle screams 1970s to the
point where the time period becomes a character all it's own in a film which already has too many characters. This
further adds the the unfocused nature of the film.
One final grievance,
and I wasn't sure how to approach this, but given that the five time
academy award nominated Amy Adams is regarded as one of the finest
working actors around today, did she really need her cleavage to play
a supporting role throughout the entire film?
Final Thoughts
American
Hustle is a good film, there is no denying that. It's direction is
competent, it's acting close to flawless and it's story is interesting.
But the apparent desperate clamour for screen time leaves it feeling
empty and unfocused and it's self awareness as an “Oscar Movie”
leaves it feeling contrived.
_______
Please Comment or tweet your thoughts (@blakeleynixon)
_______
Please Comment or tweet your thoughts (@blakeleynixon)
i
Lord of the Rings are historical films right?
No comments:
Post a Comment